Latest articles

#E0020 Is the workplace wellness program doing good?: ethical considerations around health promotion at workplace

Ethical Concerns in Workplace Wellness Programs: Do They Really Work?Several companies globally now provide workplace wellness programs (WWPs) to support their employees adopt health promotion and protection strategies. In recent years, this has become a multibillion-dollar industry, and its value is expected to increase by 2022. But, why would corporate giants spend money for health promotion among employees? It is estimated that a WWP saves up to 6 USD in medical expenses, and hence there is a monetary benefit for employers to adopt WWPs. However, with this arise some ethical concerns, which have not been discussed.We reviewed the literature on ethical analytical tools to understand the ethical concerns that need to be addressed. We found three major categories. The first was principle of autonomy, which suggests that everyone should have a right to make decisions for themselves and employers cannot force any particular WWP onto their employees. Second, the principle of beneficence/non-maleficence suggests that the objective of the program should be to provide unbiased unadulterated information about the pros and cons of the program. A WWP should be beneficial, and employers should ensure that the programs have no harmful effects. Third, the principle of justice suggests that accessibility to the WWP should be equitable and all members of the community should be treated equally regardless of their disparities.Along with the ethical concerns, we also listed a number of tools and approaches that practitioners can utilize to overcome the ethical challenges listed above. Employers must give choice to their employees so that employees can choose the less coercive or burdensome intervention. Moreover, all stakeholders must be included in the process and transparency should be maintained in the execution of the intervention. This means that all stakeholders must have a say in not only the choice of interventions but also the necessity and effectiveness of these interventions. Moreover, there is a need for honest communication and partnership in addition to building reciprocal relationships with participants.To conclude, WWPs need constant effort from practitioners to regularly ask how to provide better programs to the participants and strive for effective, transparent, and ethical public health interventions. 

#E0019 Impact of a reduction in overtime hours on sleep duration among Japanese employees

#E0018 Mental health of high-level politicians: diagnostics, public discussion and treatment―a narrative review

#E0017 Metabolic syndrome and central obesity in domestic migrant radiation decontamination workers

#E0016 Workstyle reform for Japanese doctors

#E0015 Workplace responses to COVID-19 and their association with company size and industry in an early stage of the epidemic in Japan

#E0014 Cross-sectional association between working and depression prevalence in cancer survivors: a literature review

#E0013 A literature review of the health effects of workers responding to the Great East Japan Earthquake

#E0012 Combined effect of high stress and job dissatisfaction on long-term sickness absence: A 1-year prospective study of Japanese employees

#E0011 Effect of depression prevention programs among rice farmers in Thailand

#E0010 Effects of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy on depressive symptoms among new graduate nurses: a pilot study

#E0009 Exposure to inhalable dust, endotoxin and formaldehyde in factories processing particleboards from eucalyptus trees in Ethiopia

#E0008 A survey on methods of wearing respiratory protective equipment and awareness of respiratory protection among workers engaged in dust-generating work

#E0007 Exposure to toluene and methyl ethyl ketone among workers in a rubber shoe manufacturing factory in Bangkok, Thailand: evaluation using personal sampling

#E0006 Musculoskeletal pain in Japanese workers and the relationship between labor productivity by presenteeism and chronic musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional study

#E0005 Development of an occupational health nurse’s guidebook to promote the balance between cancer treatment and work

#E0004 Referencing the body for mood state regulation: an examination of stress management using Dohsa-hou as a primary prevention program for nurses

#E0002 Proposed guidelines for primary prevention for mental health at work: an update

#E0001 Development of a support tool for balancing cancer treatment and work in small and medium-sized enterprises

#0099 Frequency of night shift and menstrual cycle characteristics in Japanese nurses working under two or three rotating shifts

#0098 The North American Helpline initiative in Bangladesh for garment workers

#0097 Screening of preservatives and evaluation of sterilized cellulose nanofibers for toxicity studies

#0096 Workplace and community social capital and burnout among professionals of health and welfare services for the seniors: a multilevel analysis of Japan

#0095 The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the mental health of healthcare workers in a hospital setting—A Systematic Review

#0094 The association of subjective fit perceptions, distress, emotional exhaustion, and work engagement, with work functioning problems: A cross‐sectional study conducted among young construction project management professionals

#0093 Relationship between exposure to Extremely Low-Frequency (ELF) magnetic field and the level of some reproductive hormones among power plant workers

#0092 Responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic: The role of occupational health services in a tertiary hospital in Singapore

#0091 Walking at work: Maximum gait speed is related to work ability in hospital nursing staff

#0090 Editorial: Prevention of musculoskeletal pain among professional drivers

#0089 Essential, not peripheral: Addressing health care workers’ mental health concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic